Environmental Psychology 5th Edition Bell Pdf Printer

Posted on
Environmental Psychology 5th Edition Bell Pdf Printer Rating: 8,4/10 5380 reviews
PrinterMastering psychology 5th edition pdf

Psychology 5th Edition By Hockenbury

  1. Acham, K. (2003). Zu den Bedingungen der Entstehung von Neuem in der Wissenschaft [Conditions of the emergence of novelty in science]. In W. Berka, E. Brix, & C. Smekal (Eds.), Woher kommt das Neue? Kreativität in Wissenschaft und Kunst (pp. 1–28). Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
  2. Alligood, M. R. (1991). Testing Roger's theory of accelerating change: The relationship among creativity, actualization, and empathy in persons 18 to 92 years of age. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 13, 84–96.Google Scholar
  3. Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 221–233.Google Scholar
  4. Amabile, T. M. (1983a). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Amabile, T. M. (1983b). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–377.Google Scholar
  6. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 10, (pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  7. Amabile, T. M. (1995). KEYS: Assessing the climate for creativity. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
  8. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. New York: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  9. Amabile, T. M. & Conti R. (1999). Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. The Academy of Management Journal, 42, 630–640.Google Scholar
  10. Amabile, T. M. & Gryskiewicz, N. (1989). The creative environment scales: The work environ ment inventory. Creative Research Journal, 2, 231–254.Google Scholar
  11. Amabile, T. M., Goldfarb, P., & Brackfield, S. (1990). Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, co-action, and surveillance. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 6–21.Google Scholar
  12. Amabile, T. M., Conti R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.Google Scholar
  13. Ambrose, D. (2006). Large-scale contextual influences on creativity: Evolving academic disci plines and global value systems. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 75–85.Google Scholar
  14. Andre, T., Schumer, H., & Whitaker, P. (1979). Group discussion and individual creativity. Journal of General Psychology, 100, 111–123.Google Scholar
  15. Andrews, F. M. & Farris, G. F. (1967). Supervisory practices and innovation in scientific teams. Personnel Psychology, 20, 497–515.Google Scholar
  16. Anspach, E. (1952). The nemesis of creativity: Observations on our occupation of Germany. Social Research, 19, 403–429.Google Scholar
  17. Anthony, K. & Watkins, N. (2002). Exploring pathology: Relationships between clinical and envi ronmental psychology. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 129–145). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: The magic synthesis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Banghart, F. D. & Spraker, H. S. (1963). Group influence on creativity in mathematics. The Journal of Experimental Education, 31, 257–263.Google Scholar
  20. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478–485.Google Scholar
  22. Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehardt & Winston.Google Scholar
  23. Barron, F. B. & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.Google Scholar
  24. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  25. Bateson, G. & Bateson, M. (1987). Angels fear: Towards an epistemology of the sacred. Toronto: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  26. Becker, G. (2000–2001). The association of creativity and psychopathology: Its cultural-historical origins. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 45–53.Google Scholar
  27. Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental psychology. 5th edi tion. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Bergler, E. (1950). The writer and psychoanalysis. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  29. Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  30. Berlin, I. N. (1960). Aspects of creativity and the learning process. American Imago— A Psychoanalytic Journal for the Arts and Sciences, 17, 83–99.Google Scholar
  31. Biersack, A. (1999). Introduction: From the “new ecology” to the new ecologies. American Anthropologist, New Series, 101, 5–18.Google Scholar
  32. Bloomberg, M. (1967). An inquiry into the relationship between field independence-dependence and creativity. Journal of Psychology, 67, 127–140.Google Scholar
  33. Bloomberg, M. (1971). Creativity as related to field independence and mobility. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 118, 3–12.Google Scholar
  34. Boden, M. (1994). What is creativity? In M. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of creativity (pp. 75–117). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Boden, M. (2004). In a nutshell. In M. Boden (Ed.), The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (revised and expanded 2nd ed.). London: Routledge (pp. 1–24).Google Scholar
  36. Bond, C. F., Jr. & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 265–292.Google Scholar
  37. Bonnes, M. & Secchiaroli, G. (1995). Environmental psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Briskman, L. (1980). Creative product and creative process in science and the arts. Inquiry: An interdisciplinary journal of philosophy23, 83–106.Google Scholar
  39. Brown, A. D. & Starkey, K. (2000). Organizational identity and learning: A psychodynamic perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 102–120.Google Scholar
  40. Brown, V. , Tumeo, M., Larey, T. S., & Paulus, P. B. (1998). Modeling cognitive interactions dur ing group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29, 495–526.Google Scholar
  41. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  42. Brunswik, E. (1957). Scope and aspects of cognitive problems. In J. S. Bruner (Ed.), Contemporary approaches to cognition (pp. 5–31). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Burchard, E. M. L. (1952). The use of projective techniques in the analysis of creativity. Journal of Projective Techniques, 16, 412–427.Google Scholar
  44. Campbell, J., Dunnette, M. D., Lawler, E. E., & Weick, K. E. (1970). Managerial behavior, per formance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  45. Candolle, A. de (1873). Histoire des sciences et des savants depuis deux siecles [History of sci ence and scholarship over two centuries]. Geneva, Switzerland: Georg.Google Scholar
  46. Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of places. London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  47. Canter, D. (1985). Putting situations in their place: Foundations for a bridge between social and environmental psychology. In A. Furnham (Ed.), Social behavior in context (pp. 208–239). London: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  48. Carlozzi, A., Bull, K. S., Eells, G. T., & Hurlburt, J. D. (1995). Empathy as related to creativity, dogmatism, and expressiveness. Journal of Psychology, 129, 365–373.Google Scholar
  49. Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: The mediating role of psychological processes. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 187–199.Google Scholar
  50. Clapham, M. M. (2000–2001). The effects of affect manipulation and information exposure on divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 335–350.Google Scholar
  51. Clitheroe, H. C., Stokols, D., & Zmuidzinas, M. (1998). Conceptualizing the context of environ ment and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 103–112.Google Scholar
  52. Cooper, R. B. & Jayatilaka, B. (2006). Group creativity: The effects of extrinsic, intrinsic, and obligation motivations. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 153–172.Google Scholar
  53. Couger, J. D. (1995). Creative problem solving and opportunity finding. Danvers, MA: Boyd & Fraser.Google Scholar
  54. Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 391–404.Google Scholar
  55. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Cummings, L. L. (1965). Organizational climates for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 8, 220–227.Google Scholar
  59. D'Agostino, F. (1984). Chomsky on creativity. Synthese, 58, 85–117.Google Scholar
  60. DeBono, E. (1968). New Think. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  61. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39–80). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  62. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  63. Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 619–654.Google Scholar
  64. Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) (1998). The creative industries mapping report. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  65. Díaz de Chumaceiro, C. L. (1998). Serendipity in Freud's career: Before Paris. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 79–81.Google Scholar
  66. Díaz de Chumaceiro, C. L. (1999). Research on career paths: Serendipity and its analog. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 227–229.Google Scholar
  67. Díaz de Chumaceiro, C. L. (2004). Serendipity and pseudoserendipity in career paths of success ful women: Orchestra conductors. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 345–356.Google Scholar
  68. Diehl, M. & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392–403.Google Scholar
  69. Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 24, 286–307.Google Scholar
  70. Dreistadt, R. (1969). The use of analogies and incubation in obtaining insight in creative problem solving. Journal of Psychology, 71, 159–175.Google Scholar
  71. Dunnette, M. D., Campbell, J., & Jaastad, K. (1963). The effect of group participation on brain-storming effectiveness for two industrial samples. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 30–37.Google Scholar
  72. Earl, W. L. (1987). Creativity and self-trust: A field study. Adolescence, 22, 419–432.Google Scholar
  73. Eisenberger, R. & Rhoades, L. (2001). Incremental effects of reward on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 728–741.Google Scholar
  74. Eisenberger, R., Rhoades, L., & Cameron, J. (1999). Does pay for performance increase or decrease perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1026–1040.Google Scholar
  75. Eissler, K. R. (1967). Psychopathology and creativity. American Imago—A Psychoanalytic Journal for the Arts and Sciences, 24, 35–81.Google Scholar
  76. Ellis, H. (1926). A study of British genius (rev. ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  77. Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.) (1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  78. Eulie, J. (1984). Creativity: Its implications for social studies. Social Studies, 75, 28–31.Google Scholar
  79. Eysenck, H. J. (1994). The measurement of creativity. In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of crea tivity (pp. 199–242). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  80. Feldman, D. H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, H. (1994). Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  81. Fischer-Kowalski, M. & Erb, K. (2003). Gesellschaftlicher Stoffwechsel im Raum. Auf der Suche nach einem sozialwissenschaftlichen Zugang zur biophysischen Realität [Societal metabo lism in space: In search of a social science approach to biophysical reality]. In G. Kohlhepp, A. Leidlmair, & F. Scholz (Series Eds.) & P. Meusburger & T. Schwan (Vol. Eds.), Erdkundliches Wissen: Vol. 135. Humanökologie: Ansätze zur Überwindung der Natur-Kultur-Dichotomie (pp. 257–285). Stuttgart, Germany: Steiner.Google Scholar
  82. Fischer-Kowalski, M. & Weisz, H. (1998). Society as a hybrid between material and symbolic realms: Towards a theoretical framework of society-nature interaction. Advances in Human Ecology, 8, 215–251.Google Scholar
  83. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it's transforming work, leisure, com munity and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  84. Florida, R. L. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 1112–1142.Google Scholar
  86. Forehand, G. A. & Gilmer, B. (1964). Environmental variation in studies of organizational behav ior. Psychological Bulletin, 62, 361–382.Google Scholar
  87. Forgays, D. G. & Forgays, D. K. (1992). Creativity enhancement through flotation isolation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 329–335.Google Scholar
  88. Frensch, P. A. & Funke, J. (1995). Definitions, traditions, and a general framework for understand ing complex problem solving. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  89. Friedman, R. S. & Förster, J. (2002). The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 41–55.Google Scholar
  90. Funke, J. (2000). Psychologie der Kreativität (Psychology of creativity). In R. M. Holm-Hadulla (Ed.), Kreativität. Heidelberger Jahrbücher 44 (pp. 283–300). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  91. Funke, J. (2007). The perception of space from a psychological perspective. In J. Wassmann & K. Stockhaus (Eds.), Experiencing new worlds (pp. 245–257). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  92. Gagliardi, P. (1986). The creation and change of organizational cultures: A conceptual framework. Organization Studies, 7, 117–134.Google Scholar
  93. Gallo, D. (1989). Educating for empathy, reason and imagination. Journal of Creative Behavior, 23, 98–115.Google Scholar
  94. Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  95. Gardner, H. (1988). Creative lives and creative works: A synthetic scientific approach. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 298–321). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Gardner, H. (1993a). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books, London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  97. Gardner, H. (1993b). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity as seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  98. Gardner, H. (1995). Creativity: New views from psychology and education. RSA Journal, 143, 5459, 33–42.Google Scholar
  99. Gibson, J. J. (1960). The concept of stimulus in psychology. American Psychologist, 15, 694–703.Google Scholar
  100. Gibson, J. J. (1979). An ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  101. Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Reviews of Sociology, 26, 463–496.Google Scholar
  102. Gieryn, T. F. (2002a). Give place a chance: Reply to Gans. City & Community, 1, 341–343.Google Scholar
  103. Gieryn, T. F. (2002b). What buildings do. Theory and Society, 31, 35–74.Google Scholar
  104. Gimbel, J. (1990). Science, technology, and reparations: Exploitation and plunder in postwar Germany. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Givens, P. R. (1962). Identifying and encouraging creative processes: The characteristics of the creative individual and the environment that fosters them. Journal of Higher Education, 33, 295–301.Google Scholar
  106. Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 1081–1111.Google Scholar
  107. Goldsmith, R. E. & Matherley, T. A. (1988). Creativity and self-esteem: A multiple operationali-zation validity study. Journal of Psychology, 122, 47–56.Google Scholar
  108. Gordon, G. & Marquis, S. (1966). Freedom, visibility of consequences, and scientific innovation. The American Journal of Sociology, 72, 195–202.Google Scholar
  109. Götz, I. L. (1981). On defining creativity. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 39, 297–301.Google Scholar
  110. Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405.Google Scholar
  111. Graumann, C.-F. (1996). Aneignung [Appropriation]. In L. Kruse, C.-F. Graumann, & E. Lantermann (Eds.), Ökologische Psychologie. Ein Handbuch in Schlüsselbegriffen (pp. 124–130). Weinheim, Germany: Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
  112. Graumann, C.-F. (2002). The phenomenological approach to people-environment studies. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (pp. 95–113). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  113. Graumann, C.-F. & Kruse, L. (2003). Räumliche Umwelt. Die Perspektive der humanökolo-gisch orientierten Umweltpsychologie [Spatial environment: The perspective of environ mental psychology oriented to human ecology]. In G. Kohlhepp, A. Leidlmair, & F. Scholz (Series Eds.) & P. Meusburger & T. Schwan (Vol. Eds.), Erdkundliches Wissen: Vol. 135. Humanökologie: Ansätze zur Überwindung der Natur-Kultur-Dichotomie (pp. 239–256). Stuttgart, Germany: Steiner.Google Scholar
  114. Gray, C. E. (1958). An analysis of Graeco-Roman development: The epicyclical evolution of Graeco-Roman civilization. American Anthropologist, New Series, 60, 13–31.Google Scholar
  115. Gray, C. E. (1961). An epicyclical model for Western civilization. American Anthropologist, New Series, 63, 1014–1037.Google Scholar
  116. Gray, C. E. (1966). Measurement of Creativity in Western civilization. American Anthropologist, New Series, 68, 1384–1417.Google Scholar
  117. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  118. Hage, J. & Dewar, R. (1973). Elite values versus organizational structure in predicting innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 279–290.Google Scholar
  119. Hanák, P. (1993). Social marginality and cultural creativity in Vienna and Budapest (1890–1914). In E. Brix & A. Janik (Eds.), Kreatives Milieu. Wien um 1900 (pp. 128–161). Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik.Google Scholar
  120. Hausman, C. R. (1979). Criteria of creativity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 40, 237–249.Google Scholar
  121. Hellriegel, D. & Slocum, J. W. (1974). Organizational climate: Measures, research and contingen cies. The Academy of Management Journal, 17, 255–280.Google Scholar
  122. Hennessey, B. A. & Amabile, T. M. (1988). The conditions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 11–38). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  123. Hennings, W. (2007). On the constitution of space and the construction of places: Java's magic axis. In J. Wassmann & K. Stockhaus (Eds.), Experiencing new worlds (pp. 125–145). New York/Oxford, England: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  124. Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity. Intelligence, 4, 25–40.Google Scholar
  125. Hoffman, L. R. (1959). Homogeneity of member personality and its effects on group problem-solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 27–32.Google Scholar
  126. Hoffman, L. R. & Maier, N. R. F. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by mem bers of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal und Social Psychology, 62, 401–407.Google Scholar
  127. Hoffman, L. R. & Smith, C. G. (1960). Some factors affecting the behavior of members of problem-solving groups. Sociometry, 23, 273–291.Google Scholar
  128. Holmes, F. L. (1986). Patterns of scientific creativity. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 60, 19–35.Google Scholar
  129. Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., & Ekvall, G. (1999). Situational outlook questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports, 85, 665–674.Google Scholar
  130. Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G., & Britz, A. (2000–2001). Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the situational outlook question naire. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 171–184.Google Scholar
  131. Isen, A. M. (1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 203–253). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  132. Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122–1131.Google Scholar
  133. James, L. R. & Jones, A. P. (1974). Organizational climate: A review of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1096–1112.Google Scholar
  134. James, L., Hater, J., Gent, M., & Bruni, J. (1978). Psychological climate: Implications from cognitive social learning theory and interactional psychology. Personnel Psychology, 31, 783–813.Google Scholar
  135. Jaušovec, N. (2000). Differences in cognitive processes between gifted, intelligent, creative, and average individuals while solving complex problems: An EEG study. Intelligence, 28, 213–237.Google Scholar
  136. Jeffcutt, P. (2005). The organizing of creativity in knowledge economies: Exploring strategic issues. In D. Rooney, G. Hearn, & A. Ninan (Eds.), Handbook on the knowledge economy (pp. 102–117). Cheltenham/Northampton/UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  137. Jöns, H. (2003). Grenzüberschreitende Mobilität und Kooperation in den Wissenschaften. Deutschlandaufenthalte US-amerikanischer Humboldt-Forschungspreisträger aus einer erweiterten Akteursnetzwerkperspektive [Cross-boundary mobility and cooperation in the sciences: U.S. Humboldt Research Award winners in Germany from an expanded actor-network perspective] (Heidelberger Geographische Arbeiten No. 116). Heidelberg, Germany: Selbstverlag des Geographischen Instituts.Google Scholar
  138. Jöns, H. (2006). Dynamic hybrids and the geographies of technoscience: Discussing conceptual resources beyond the human/non-human binary. Social & Cultural Geography, 7, 559–580.Google Scholar
  139. Kalliopuska, M. (1992). Creative way of living. Psychological Reports, 70, 11–14.Google Scholar
  140. Karau, S. J. & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681–706.Google Scholar
  141. Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining creativity: The attributional perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 311–366.Google Scholar
  142. Kazanjian, R. K. (1988). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. The Academy of Management Journal, 31, 257–279.Google Scholar
  143. Kerr, N. L. & Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94.Google Scholar
  144. Klausmeier, H. J. (1961). Learning and human abilities: Educational psychology. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  145. Kleinschmidt, H. (1978). American Imago on psychoanalysis, art, and creativity: 1964–1976. American Imago—A Psychoanalytic Journal for the Arts and Sciences, 35, 45–58.Google Scholar
  146. Klüter, H. (2003). Raum als Umgebung (Space as environment). In G. Kohlhepp, A. Leidlmair, & F. Scholz (Series Eds.) & P. Meusburger & T. Schwan (Vol. Eds.), Erdkundliches Wissen: Vol. 135. Humanökologie: Ansätze zur Überwindung der Natur-Kultur-Dichotomie (pp. 217– 238). Stuttgart, Germany: Steiner.Google Scholar
  147. Koch, A. (2003). Raumkonstruktionen [Space constructs]. In G. Kohlhepp, A. Leidlmair, & F. Scholz (Series Eds.) & P. Meusburger & T. Schwan (Vol. Eds.), Erdkundliches Wissen: Vol. 135. Humanökologie: Ansätze zur Überwindung der Natur-Kultur-Dichotomie (pp. 175–196). Stuttgart, Germany: Steiner.Google Scholar
  148. Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  149. Kroeber, A. L. (1944). Configurations of culture growth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  150. Kurtzberg, T. R. & Amabile, T. (2000–2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 285–294.Google Scholar
  151. Lamm, H. & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361–387.Google Scholar
  152. Laughlin, H. P. (1970). The ego and its defenses. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  153. Leddy, T. (1994). A pragmatist theory of artistic creativity. Journal of Value Inquiry, 28, 169–180.Google Scholar
  154. Li, J. & Gardner, H. (1993). How domains constrain creativity. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 94–101.Google Scholar
  155. Lindgren, H. C. & Lindgren, F. (1965). Creativity, brainstorming, and orneriness: A cross-cultural study. The Journal of Social Psychology, (ISSN-0022-4545) 67, 23–30.Google Scholar
  156. Lubart, T. I. (2000–2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295–308.Google Scholar
  157. Lubart, T. I. & Getz, I. (1997). Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 285–301.Google Scholar
  158. Magyari-Beck, I. (1998). Is creativity a real phenomenon? Creativity Research Journal, 11, 83–88.Google Scholar
  159. Maitland, J. (1976). Creativity. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 34, 397–409.Google Scholar
  160. Mandler, G. (1992). Memory, arousal, and mood: A theoretical integration. In S. A. Christianson (Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory (pp. 93–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  161. March, J. & Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  162. Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, situation, and creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 211–232). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  163. Martindale, C., Abrams, L., & Hines D. (1974). Creativity and resistance to cognitive dissonance. The Journal of Social Psychology, (ISSN-00224545) 92, 317–318.Google Scholar
  164. Matlin, M. W. & Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Social facilitation of word associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 455–460.Google Scholar
  165. Matthiesen, U. (2006). Raum und Wissen. Wissensmilieus und KnowledgeScapes als Inkubatoren für zukunftsfähige stadtregionale Entwicklungsdynamiken? [Space and Knowledge: Knowl edge milieus and knowledgescapes as incubators for sustainable urban development dyna mics]. In D. Tänzler, H. Knoblauch, & H. Soeffner (Eds.), Zur Kritik der Wissensgesellschaft (pp. 155–188). Konstanz, Germany: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  166. Matthiesen, U. (2007). Wissensmilieus und KnowledgeScapes [Knowledge milieus and knowledgescapes]. In R. Schützeichel (Ed.), Handbuch Wissenssoziologie und Wissensforschung (pp. 679–693). Konstanz, Germany: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  167. Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 449–460). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  168. McCoy, J. M. & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 409–426.Google Scholar
  169. Meusburger, P. (1997). Spatial and social inequality in communist countries and in the first period of the transformation process to a market economy: The example of Hungary. Geographical Review of Japan, Series B, 70, 126–143.Google Scholar
  170. Meusburger, P. (1998). Bildungsgeographie. Wissen und Ausbildung in der räumlichen Dimension [Geography of education: Knowledge and education in the spatial dimension]. Heidelberg, Germany: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  171. Meusburger, P. (2000). The spatial concentration of knowledge: Some theoretical considerations. Erdkunde, 54, 352–364.Google Scholar
  172. Meusburger, P. (2008). The nexus between knowledge and space. In P. Meusburger (Series Eds.) & P. Meusburger, M. Welker, & E. Wunder (Vol. Eds.), Knowledge and space: Vol. 1. Clashes of Knowledge. Orthodoxies and heterodoxies in science and religion (pp. 35–90). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  173. Miller, A. I. (2000). Insights of genius: Imagery and creativity in science and art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  174. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3–23.Google Scholar
  175. Mumford, M. D. (1995). Situational influences on creative achievement: Attributions or interac tions? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 405–412.Google Scholar
  176. Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–120.Google Scholar
  177. Mumford, M. D. & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43.Google Scholar
  178. Munro, T. (1962). What causes creative epochs in the arts? The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 21, 35–48.Google Scholar
  179. Neisser, U. (1987). From direct perception to conceptual structure. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 11–23). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  180. Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influences. Psychological Review, 93, 23–32.Google Scholar
  181. Neves-Graça, K. (2003). Investigating ecology: Cognitions in human-environmental relation ships. In G. Kohlhepp, A. Leidlmair, & F. Scholz (Series Eds.) & P. Meusburger & T. Schwan (Vol. Eds.), Erdkundliches Wissen: Vol. 135. Humanökologie: Ansätze zur Überwindung der Natur-Kultur-Dichotomie (pp. 309–326). Stuttgart, Germany: Steiner.Google Scholar
  182. Neves-Graça, K. (2007). Elementary methodological tools for a recursive approach to human-environmental relations. In J. Wassmann & K. Stockhaus (Eds.), Experiencing new worlds (pp. 146–164). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  183. Niederland, W. G. (1967). Clinical aspects of creativity. American Imago, 24, 6–34.Google Scholar
  184. Norlander, T., Bergman, H., & Archer, T. (1998). Effects of flotation REST on creative problem solving and originality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 399–408.Google Scholar
  185. Ohnmacht, F. W. & McMorris, R. F. (1971). Creativity as a function of field independence and dogmatism. Journal of Psychology, 79, 165–168.Google Scholar
  186. Oldham, G. R. & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.Google Scholar
  187. O'Reilly, C. A. (1991). Organizational behavior: Where we've been, where we are going. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 42, pp. 427–458). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
  188. Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. Principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York: Charles Scribner's.Google Scholar
  189. Ostwald, W. (1909). Grosse Männer [Great men]. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  190. Patrick, C. (1937). Creative thought in artists. Journal of Psychology, 4, 35–73.Google Scholar
  191. Patton, J. D. (2002). The role of problem pioneers in creative innovation. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 111–126.Google Scholar
  192. Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 237–262.Google Scholar
  193. Paulus, P. B. & Dzindolet, M. T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575–586.Google Scholar
  194. Paulus, P. B. & Yang, H. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 76–87.Google Scholar
  195. Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., & Ortega, A. H. (1995). Performance and perception of brainstormers in an organizational setting. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 249–265.Google Scholar
  196. Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., & Dzindolet, M. T. (2000). Creativity in groups and teams. In M. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 319–338). Hillsdale, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar
  197. Peterson, M. F. (1998). Embedded organizational event: The units of process in organizational science. Organization Science, 9, 16–33.Google Scholar
  198. Plucker, J. A. & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–61). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  199. Rappaport, R. (1979). Ecology, meaning and religion. Richmond, CA: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  200. Raudsepp, E. (1958). The industrial climate for creativity: An opinion study of 105 experts. Management Review, 47, 4–8 and 70–75.Google Scholar
  201. Reber, A. S. (1992). The cognitive unconscious: An evolutionary perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 1, 93–133.Google Scholar
  202. Redmond, M. R. & Mumford, M. D. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behav ior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 120–151.Google Scholar
  203. Rees, M. & Goldman, M. (1961). Some relationships between creativity and personality. Journal of General Psychology, 65, 145–161.Google Scholar
  204. Rescher, N. (1966). A new look at the problem of innate ideas. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 17, 205–218.Google Scholar
  205. Robinson, J. (1970). Valéry's view of mental creativity. Yale French Studies, 44, 3–18.Google Scholar
  206. Rokeach, M. (1954). The nature and meaning of dogmatism. Psychological Review, 61, 194–204.Google Scholar
  207. Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  208. Runco, M. A. (1988). Creativity research: Originality, utility, and integration. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 1–7.Google Scholar
  209. Runco, M. A. (1993). Operant theories of insight, originality, and creativity. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 54–67.Google Scholar
  210. Runco, M. A. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  211. Runco, M. A. & Okuda, S. M. (1988). Problem discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17, 213–222.Google Scholar
  212. Russ, S. W. (1993). Affect and creativity: The role of affect and play in the creative process. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  213. Saaty, T. L. (1998). Reflections and projections on creativity in operations research and manage ment science: A pressing need for a shift in paradigm. Operations Research, 46, 9–16.Google Scholar
  214. Sadler, W. A. & Green, S. (1977). Feature Essay. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 6, 156–159.Google Scholar
  215. Salbaum, J. (2008). Zeichen der Mehrdeutigkeit [Signs of polyvalence]. In H. Eigner, B. Ratter, & R. Dikau (Eds.), Umwelt als System—System als Umwelt? Systemtheorien auf dem Prüfstand (pp.155–169). Munich, Germany: Oekom.Google Scholar
  216. Schacter, D. L. (1992). Understanding implicit memory: A cognitive neuroscience approach. American Psychologist, 47, 559–569.Google Scholar
  217. Schein, E. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  218. Schluchter, W (2005). Handlung, Ordnung und Kultur. Studien zu einem Forschungsprogramm im Anschluss an Max Weber [Action, order, and culture: Studies for a research program building on Max Weber]. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  219. Schorske, C. E. (1997). The new rigorism in the human sciences: 1940–1960. In T. Bender & C. E. Schorske (Eds.), American academic culture in transformation: Fifty years, four disciplines (pp. 309–329). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  220. Schuldberg, D. (2000–2001). Creativity and psychopathology: Categories, dimensions, and dynamics. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 105–110.Google Scholar
  221. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard Economic Studies, Vol. 46. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Original German work published 1912)Google Scholar
  222. Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A Path model of indi vidual innovation in the workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607.Google Scholar
  223. Scott, W. E. (1965). The creative individual. The Academy of Management Journal, 8, 211–219.Google Scholar
  224. Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. The Academy of Management Journal, 38, 483–503.Google Scholar
  225. Shalley, C. E. & Oldham, G. R. (1985). Effects of goal difficulty and expected evaluation on intrinsic motivation: A laboratory study. The Academy of Management Journal, 28, 628–640.Google Scholar
  226. Shalley, C. E. & Perry-Smith, J. E. (2001). Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 1–22.Google Scholar
  227. Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. The Academy of Management Journal, 43, 215–223.Google Scholar
  228. Shaw, G. A. (1987). Creativity and Hypermnesia for words and pictures. Journal of General Psychology, 114, 167–178.Google Scholar
  229. Shekerjian, F. (1990). Uncommon genius: How great ideas are born. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  230. Shore, E. (1971). Sensory deprivation, preconscious processes and scientific thinking. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 41, 574–580.Google Scholar
  231. Simonton, D. K. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1119–1133.Google Scholar
  232. Simonton, D. K. (1979). Multiple discovery and invention: Zeitgeist, genius, or chance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1603–1616.Google Scholar
  233. Simonton, D. K. (1981). Creativity in Western civilization: Intrinsic and extrinsic causes. American Anthropologist, New Series, 83, 628–630.Google Scholar
  234. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 116–133). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  235. Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151–158.Google Scholar
  236. Slochower, H. (1967). Genius, psychopathology and creativity. American Imago, 24, 3–5.Google Scholar
  237. Smith, C. G. (1971). Scientific performance and the composition of research teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 486–496.Google Scholar
  238. Stahl, M. J. & Koser, M. C. (1978). Weighted productivity in R & D: Some associated individual and organizational variables. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-25, 20–24.Google Scholar
  239. Stamm, J. (1967). Creativity and sublimation. American Imago, 24, 82–97.Google Scholar
  240. Staw, B. M. (1990). An evolutionary approach to creativity and innovation. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 287–308). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  241. Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501–524.Google Scholar
  242. Stein, M. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 311–322.Google Scholar
  243. Sternberg, R. E. & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1–31.Google Scholar
  244. Sternberg, R. E. & Lubart T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  245. Sternberg, R. E. & O'Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251–272). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  246. Suedfeld, P. (1968). The cognitive effects of sensory deprivation: The role of task complexity. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22, 302–307.Google Scholar
  247. Suedfeld, P. (1974). Social isolation: A case for interdisciplinary research. Canadian Psychologist, 15, 1–15.Google Scholar
  248. Suedfeld, P. (1980). Restricted environmental stimulation: Research and clinical applications. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  249. Suedfeld, P. & Landon, P. B. (1970). Motivational arousal and task complexity: Support for a model of cognitive changes in sensory deprivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 329–330.Google Scholar
  250. Suedfeld, P., Metcalfe, J., & Bluck, S. (1987). Enhancement of scientific creativity by flotation REST (restricted environmental stimulation technique). Journal of Environmental Psychology, 7, 219–231.Google Scholar
  251. Suojanen, W. & Brooke, S. (1971). The management of creativity. California Management Review, 14, 1, 17–23.Google Scholar
  252. Sutton, R. I. & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685–718.Google Scholar
  253. Symington, N. (1987). The sources of creativity. American Imago, 44, 275–287.Google Scholar
  254. Tagiuri, R. (1968). The concept of organizational climate. In R. Tagiuri & G. H. Litwin (Eds.), Organizational climate: Explorations of a concept (pp. 11–32). Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  255. Thomas, C. A. (1955). Creativity in science: The eight annual Arthur Dehon Little memorial lecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  256. Törnqvist, G. (2004). Creativity in time and space. Geografiska Annaler, 86 B, 227–243.Google Scholar
  257. Torrance, E. P. (1995). Why fly: A philosophy of creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  258. Treffinger, D. J. (1995). Creative problem solving: Overview and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 301–312.Google Scholar
  259. True, S. (1966). A study of the relation of general semantics and creativity. Journal of Experimental Education, 34, 34–40.Google Scholar
  260. Unsworth, K. (2001). Unpacking creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 26, 289–297.Google Scholar
  261. Van Gundy, A. (1987). Organizational creativity and innovation. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research (pp. 358–379). Buffalo, NY: Bearly.Google Scholar
  262. Vidal, F. (2003). Contextual biography and the evolving systems approach to creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 73–82.Google Scholar
  263. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
  264. Wassmann, J. (2003). Landscape and memory in Papua New Guinea. In H. Gebhardt & H. Kiesel (Eds.), Weltbilder (pp. 329–346). Heidelberger Jahrbücher No. 47. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  265. Wassmann, J. & Keck, V. (2007). Introduction. In J. Wassmann & K. Stockhaus (Eds.), Experiencing new worlds (pp. 1–18). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  266. Weichhart, P. (2003). Gesellschaftlicher Metabolismus und Action Settings. Die Verknüpfung von Sach- und Sozialstrukturen im alltagsweltlichen Handeln [Social metabolism and action settings: The link between technical and social structures in everyday action]. In G. Kohlhepp, A. Leidlmair, & F. Scholz (Series Eds.) & P. Meusburger & T. Schwan (Vol. Eds.), Erdkundliches Wissen: Vol. 135. Humanökologie: Ansätze zur Überwindung der Natur-Kultur-Dichotomie (pp. 15–44). Stuttgart, Germany: Steiner.Google Scholar
  267. Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  268. West, M. A. (1989). Innovation amongst health care professionals. Social Behaviour, 4, 173–184.Google Scholar
  269. Westfall, R. S. (1983). Newton's development of the Principia. In R. Aris, T. Davis, & R. H. Stuewer (Eds.), Springs of scientific creativity. Essays on founders of modern science (pp. 21–43). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  270. Westland, G. (1969). The investigation of creativity. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 28, 127–131.Google Scholar
  271. Wierenga, B. & van Bruggen, G. H. (1998). The dependent variable in research into the effects of creative support systems: Quality and quantity of ideas. MIS Quarterly, 22, 81–87.Google Scholar
  272. Williams, W. M. & Yang, L. T. (1999). Organizational creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 373–391). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  273. Witkin, H. A., Dyke, R. B., Faterson, H. F. Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A. (1962). Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  274. Woodman, R. W. & King, D. C. (1978). Organizational climate: Science or folklore? The Academy of Management Review, 3, 816–826.Google Scholar
  275. Woodman, R. W. & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1990). An interactionist model of creative behavior. Journal of Creative Behavior, 24, 279–290.Google Scholar
  276. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational crea tivity. The Academy of Management Review, 18, 293–321.Google Scholar
  277. Workman, E. A. & Stillion, J. M. (1974). The relationship between creativity and ego develop ment. The Journal of Psychology, 88, 191–195.Google Scholar
  278. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.Google Scholar
  279. Zhou, J. & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. The Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696.Google Scholar
Environmental Psychology 5th Edition Bell Pdf Printer

In Environmental Psychology (5th edition), on page 478, Table 14-1 shows the 'Relative Impact of Interventions to Save the Commons'. The authors weigh the impacts of 9 factors that influence 'environmentally sound behavior' and come up with the following table relating 'factor' to 'impact'. Psychology is the scientific study of the biological bases of behavior and mental states. Psychology is an academic and applied field involving the study of behavior, mind and thought and the subconscious neurological bases of behaviour. Psychology also refers to the application of such.